The principle of net neutrality is to give internet access to every subscriber unconditionally. Currently in India we enjoy net neutrality.
TRAI invited feedback from citizen and asked whether “discrimination” via providing net access conditionally is reasonable or not; citizens have answered: don’t discriminate. What telcos spin is they say “free internet for poor” under the cost of a biased net neutrality. Monopolies hurt the consumer and are at the root of crony capitalism. No unfair advantage should be given to deep-pocketed adults like google, facebook, flipkart etc. , because these big giants can pay net access funds to internet/telecom service providers but not small firms can do that. The vigilante is also in the hands of customers or common people that they should ensure not taking free access of a particular service provider without net neutrality and thinking of other customers getting proper speed—another service provider with net neutrality but speed down due to traffic occupied by a compromised net neutrality. So charge customers for how much data they use and not control for what websites they visit.
The Federal Communications Commission(FFC) of the US enforced net neutrality rules in february 2015 this year. The core argument was that after the globalization the net has now become an integral part of a living by facilitating: economic, social and political lifein the contemporary world. So net should be allowed to breathe free. FFC set the standards for net neutrality—no blocking of a particular website; not practicing some sites in fast lane and some sites in slow lane—which we wish to follow now.
Internet is like an ecosystem where every entity does work independently and breathe freely to contribute in the system without any discrimination.
Manupulations Telecom companies will do after 24 April 2015
1) Websites of big companies will be faster
2) Seperate data packs for various services
You are not making any money out of it because you didn't make it.
