Step by Step Strategy to Solve Inequality Problems

April 25, 2017

Ques 1. 

W ≥ D < M < P < A = F

Conclusions:

I. F > D
II. P < W

Solution:

To solve Conclusion
I. F>D,
Consider the statement from D to F
D < M < P < A = F
Symbols between D and F are uniform i.e. < which implies D will be definitely lesser than F.
Therefore conclusion I follows

To solve conclusion
II. P < W
Consider the statement from P to W i.e. W ≥ D < M < P
Symbols between P and W are not uniform, mixer of lesser than and greater than symbol implies P can’t be definitely lesser than W
Therefore Conclusion II doesn’t follow

Ques 2.

H  ≥  M > F <A = B> S

Conclusion:

I. H > B
II. F < S

Solution:

To solve Conclusion
I. H > B
Consider the statement from H to B
H ≥ M > F <A=B
Symbols between H and B are mixer of both lesser than and greater than the symbol which implies H cannot be greater than B.
Therefore conclusion I doesn’t follow

To solve conclusion
II. F<S
Consider the statement from F to S i.e. F <A=B> S
Symbols between F and S are mixer of lesser than and greater than symbol implies F can’t be definitely lesser than S
Therefore Conclusion 2 doesn’t follow

Ques 3. 

B > T > Q > R = F

Conclusion:

I. Q ≥ F
II. T> F

Solution:

To solve Conclusion
I. Q ≥ F
Consider the statement from Q to F
Q > R = F
Above statement implies that Q is definitely greater than F
Therefore conclusion I doesn’t follow

To solve conclusion
II. T>F
Consider the statement from T to F i.e.
T>Q>R=F
Symbols between T and Fare uniform which consist of only > symbol which implies Twill be definitely greater than F
Therefore Conclusion 2 follows

Ques 4.

 H < J, F < H, I  ≤  J = K

Conclusion:

I. H > I
II. I ≥ F

Solution:

To solve Conclusion
I. H>I
Since it is split statements combine statement with H and I variable
H < J  ≥  I
Symbol between H and I are mixer of both > and < which implies H can’t be definitely greater than I.
Therefore conclusion 1 doesn’t follow

To solve conclusion
II. I ≥ F
Combine the statement of I and F
F < H < J ≥ I
Symbols between T and Fare not uniform which consist of both < and > symbol which implies I can’t be ≥ F
Therefore Conclusion 2 doesn’t follow

Direction (Q5-Q7): Read the information given below and solve the questions that follow. 
% means not greater than (% ➔ ≤)
& means not smaller than (& ➔ ≥)
# means neither equal to nor smaller than (# ➔ >)
$ means neither equal to nor greater than ($ ➔ <)
@ means neither smaller than nor greater than (@ ➔ =)
From the above statements, we can conclude,

Ques5.

Statements

M $ K,K & T,
T $ J

Conclusions:

I. J # K
II. T # M
III. M # J

Solution:

Convert the statement and conclusion from symbols to mathematical operation.
Statement: M < K ≥ T < J
Conclusion:
I. J > K
II. T > M
III. M > J

To solve Conclusion I
J>K, consider statement from J to K
K ≥ T < J
Since it is the mixer of both < and > symbol
Conclusion 1 is false

To solve Conclusion II
T > M, consider statement from T to M
M < K ≥ T
Since it is the mixer of both < and > symbol
Conclusion 2 is false

To solve Conclusion III
M > J, consider statement from M to J
M < K ≥ T < J
Since it is the mixer of both < and > symbol
Conclusion 3 is false
Therefore none of the three conclusions is true

Ques 6. 

Statements: 

F @ T
T % M
M # R

Conclusion:

R $ T
F @ M
F $ M

Solution:

Convert the statement and conclusion from symbols to mathematical operation.
Statement: F = T ≤ M > R
Conclusion:
I. R < T
II. F = M
III. F < M

To solve Conclusion I
R < T, consider statement from R to T
T ≤ M > R
Since it is the mixer of both < and > symbol
Conclusion 1 is false

To solve Conclusion 2
F = M, consider statement from F to M
F = T ≤ M
From the above statement, It is possible that F can be equal to M
Conclusion II may be True

To solve Conclusion 3
F < M, consider statement from F to M
F = T ≤ M
From the above statement, it is possible that F can be lesser than M
Conclusion III may be True
Therefore Either Conclusion 2 or 3 can be true

Ques 7. 

Statements: 

J & H,
H @ B,
B % N

Conclusion:

I. N & H
II. N @ J
III. J & B

Solution:

Convert the statement and conclusion from symbols to mathematical operation.
Statement: J ≥ H = B ≤ N
Conclusion:
I. N ≥ H
II. N = J
III. J ≥ B

To solve Conclusion I
N ≥ H, consider statement from H to N
H = B ≤ N
It clearly implies N ≥ H
Conclusion I is True

To solve Conclusion II
N=J, consider statement from N to J
J ≥ H = B ≤ N
Since it is combination of <and > symbol we can’t predict N=J
Conclusion II is False

To solve Conclusion III
J ≥ B, consider statement from J to B
J ≥ H = B
It clearly implies J ≥ B
Conclusion III is True
Therefore Conclusion I and III are True

Must Read 
Reasoning Ability: Concepts of Inequality with Examples: Part 1
Reasoning Ability: Concepts of Inequality with Examples: Part 2

Free Exam Resources

Useful material to support your preparation, revision and exam planning.

Continue on BankExamsToday

Revise notes, practice questions and resume anytime.

Meet your mentor

From the Founder

Ramandeep Singh, founder of BankExamsToday

Ramandeep Singh

Banking Educator · Former Banker

Former banker and educator helping aspirants prepare for banking promotion and specialist officer exams with focused, practical guidance.

14+
Years' experience
5,000+
Selections
Ex-BoB
Banking experience